Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144777 (ALL)

RAMKHELWN AND 6 OTHERS v. COURT ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER,TEHSIL MUSHAFIRKHANA DISTT. AMETHI DIVISION AYODHYA AND 9 OTHERS

A227/3795/2025 · 2025-07-01

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36885 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3795 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramkhelwn And 6 Others Respondent :- Court Additional Commissioner,Tehsil Mushafirkhana Distt. Amethi Division Ayodhya And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Somdutta Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. 3. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- Wherefore it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased - (I) to direct the proceedings of Case No.1150/2022 computerized case no.C202204000001150, Ramkhelwn and others vs. Shyamlal and others, pending before the opposite party no.1 i.e. court Additional Commissioner, Tehsil Musafirkhana, District Amethi,Division Ayodhya expeditiously in a time bound manner, in the interest of justice." 4. It is stated that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since September 2022 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, is suffering great hardship and mental agony. Prayer is to direct the authority concerned to decide the case within stipulated time. 5. It is further submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. 6. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 7. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned to decide the pending appeal within 6 months from the next date fixed in the matter, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation. For conducting the proceedings in the time specified, unnecessary adjournments be avoided. 8. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. . (Alok Mathur,J) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench