IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 226/2025 Decided on: 23.5.2025 Rani & ors. …..Petitioners Versus Surender Kaur & ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioners: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nemo ____________________________________________________________ Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions states that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition along with an application filed before the learned trial court with liberty to file the same afresh. 2 Since notice of this petition has not been issued to the opposite side, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 3 However, as regards prayer made for filing a fresh application on the same and similar cause of action, 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 maintainability of the same is required to be determined by the learned trial court. 4. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) 23.5.2025 Judge (pankaj)