MOHAMMAD TARIQ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/5927/2025 · 2025-06-20
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144750 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144750 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35925-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5927 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Tariq Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arshad Siddiqui,Shafaq Fatima Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mohan Singh
learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of the gaon sabha.
2. From paragraph 7 of the writ petition, it is evident that the dispute involved in the present writ petition is essentially of a civil nature between the private parties.
3. For removal of the encroachment by a private party upon the immovable property belonging to the petitioner, the remedy would lie elsewhere.
4. Once there is a civil dispute between two private parties, there is no scope for entertaining a writ petition Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. The writ petion is accordingly declined to be entertained with the liberty open to the petitioner to avail the remedy before the competent civil court.
6. The writ petion is accordingly disposed of. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
Order Date :- 20.6.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench