Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14472 (HP)

KANTA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/8626/2025 · 2025-05-26

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.8626 of 2025 Decided on: 26th May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Kanta Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of HP & Ors …..Respondents. ______________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice.   Mr.   L.N.Sharma,learned   Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This   writ   petition   has   been   filed   for   grant   of following   substantive   relief   on   the   strength   of   decision rendered in Baldev Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2: ­ i). That the retirement of the petitioner may be set 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 2711/2017 decided on 22.02.2022 aside and the deemed date of retirement of the petitioner   may   be   held   as   60   years   i.e. 31.10.2019, with all benefits incidental thereof. 3. Admittedly,   the   petitioner   has   invoked   extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution   of   India   without   even   preferring   any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted   with   above,   learned   counsel   for   the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six   weeks   thereafter.   The   order   so   passed   shall   also   be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 26, 2025 R.Atal 2