- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2718 WP No. 16106 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 16106 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M.VIJAYKUMAR S/O MEGHJI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/6, NAVKAR BUNGLOW, FORT BELLARY, BELLARY - 583 101. 2. SARALA VIJAY MEISHERY W/O VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/6, NAVKAR BUNGLOW, FORT BELLARY, BELLARY - 583 101. 3. NIKHIL KUMAR S/O VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/6, NAVKAR BUNGLOW, FORT BELLARY, BELLARY - 583 101. …PETITIONERS (ABSENT) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, 4, HAYES RD, SHANTHALA NAGAR, RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 025. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2718 WP No. 16106 of 2017 3. CITY UNION BANK, BALLARI BRANCH, BHUSHAN BHAVANA, T.S.NO. 238/2A AND 28/1A, BALLARI-BENGALURU ROAD, BALLARI - 583 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.M.VENKATA REDDY., CGC FOR R1 & 2; SRI. ASHOK KUMAR.R., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The names of the petitioners is called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. They are absent. As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petitioners were initially represented by counsel Sri.T.N.Raghupathy. In view of demise of counsel Sri.T.N.Raghupathy., Court notice was issued to the petitioners and the same returned with shara 'no such person in this address'. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2718 WP No. 16106 of 2017 The petition was listed on 17.01.2025 and the office was directed to print the names of the petitioners in the cause list and the petition was ordered to be listed on 22.01.2025. The petition is listed today by printing the names of the petitioners in the cause list. As already noted above, the names of the petitioners is called out thrice in the open Court. The petitioners are not represented. They are absent. The petitioners have neither engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4