Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1447 (AP)

M/S NIKHITA ENTERPRISES v. S SURESH KUMAR IAS

CC/2935/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010522692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2935/2025 Between: 1. M/S NIKHITA ENTERPRISES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR BATHULA LAKSHMAIAH, S/O. VEERAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.157, UDA COLONY,OPP VASAVI CLUB, AJITH SINGH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N T R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI DHYANACHANDRA H M IAS, COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. 4. SRI A SRINIVAS REDDY, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. 5. SRI J SRINIVAS, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. 6. SRI CH SINDURA LAKSHMI, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VIJAYAWADA. 2 7. SRI SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents in terms of Sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful disobeying / violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in WP.No. 18241 of 2025 dated 18.07.2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI 2. BALA MOHAN RAO S The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18241 of 2025, dated 18.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 17.04.2026 PNS