Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144698 (ALL)

SHIVLAL YADAV v. OM PRAKASH AND 4 OTHERS

A227/3736/2025 · 2025-05-30

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33871 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3736 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shivlal Yadav Respondent :- Om Prakash And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Vikram Shahi,Pratibha Gupta,Sanjeev Kumar Lodhi,Shivani Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "i) Pass an order or a direction to commanding the opposite parties to decide case no. 2234/2023, in-re Shivlal Yadav versus Om Prakash and others, filed by the Petitioner under section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, regarding cancel the lease (Patta), in connection of gata no. 174mi. measuring 0.5060 Hectare, land situated at Village Lodipur, Pargana Dhingvas, Tahsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh, pending before learned Court of Chief Revenue officer, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh U.P., with in stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court In the interest of justice. (ii) Issue the order or direction to opposite party to expedite the case no. 2234/2023, in-re Shivlal Yadav versus Om Prakash and others, filed by the Petitioner under section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, regarding cancel the lease (Patta), in connection of gata no. 174mi. measuring 0.5060 Hectare, land situated at Village Lodipur, Pargana Dhingvas, Tahsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh, pending before Learned Court of Chief Revenue officer, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh, U.P. with in stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court In the interest of justice." Taking note of the period of pendency of the case in issue, as also the period prescribed under Section 126(6) U.P. Revenue Code Rules 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code 2006, according to which concerned authority shall make all endeavour to conclude the inquiry within a period of three months from the date of issuance of notice and if the inquiry is not concluded within three months, the reasons for delay shall be recorded, the present petition is disposed of with direction to Chief Revenue Officer, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh, to conclude the proceedings in issue, detailed in the prayer clause, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before him, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.5.2025/Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench