Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33647 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3766 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shivlal Yadav Respondent :- Hansraj Devi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Vikram Shahi,Gyan Sagar Gupta,Pratibha Gupta,Sanjeev Kumar Lodhi,Shivani Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "Pass an order or a direction to commanding the opposite parties to decide case no. 2235/2023, in-re Shivlal Yadav versus Hansraj Devi and others, filed by the Petitioner under section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, regarding cancel the lease (Patta), in connection of gata no. 181mi measuring 0.2780 Hectare, 130mi measuring 0.0130 Hectare, 167mi measuring 0.0760 Hectare and 170 mi measuring 0.0126 Hectare, land situated at Village Gogahar, Pargana Dhingvas, Tahsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh, pending before learned Court of Chief Revenue officer, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh U.P., with in stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court In the interest of justice." Taking note of Rule 126(6) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as per which, Collector shall endeavor to conclude the proceedings initiated in terms of Section 128 of the Code of 2006 within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the proceedings of such nature are pending since 2023 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh to consider and decide the Case No., quoted in relief clause, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a maximum period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.5.2025/Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench