ADITYA PANCHOLI SON OF SHRI RAMPRASAD PANCHOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2030/2025 · 2025-07-23
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14469 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14469 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2030/2025 Aditya Pancholi Son Of Shri Ramprasad Pancholi, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Sharma Colony, Infront Of Gurjar Chhatrawas, Tonk (Raj). At Present Resident Of Anand Vihar, Bhuvneshwari I.t.i. College, Bypass Kota Road, Tonk, Police Station Sadar Tonk, District Tonk (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Devraj Son Of Shri Laxman Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Alipura, Police Station Mehandwas, District Tonk (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 23/07/2025 The instant criminal misc. petition is preferred under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the criminal proceeding arising out of FIR No. 231/2021 registered with police station Sadar, Tonk District Tonk for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the incident took place in the year 2017 and the FIR was lodged in the year 2021 and the matter pertains to three cheques. It is also informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier petitioner’s petition i.e. SB Criminal Misc. Petition No. 4981/2021 was dismissed by the coordinate Bench vide order dated
[2025:RJ-JP:27553] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2030/2025] 06.02.2025, with the liberty to raise all the objections before the learned trial court. Heard and perused the material available on the record. The Petitioner has not raised any objection before the concerned court, there is no order available on record which shows that petitioner raised any objection before the concerned trial court. The petitioner has again challenged the same FIR in which order has already been passed by the Co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 06.02.2025. The petition itself is misconceived, accordingly the same is dismissed. All pending applications, if any, shall also stands disposed of.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /40