Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144675 (ALL)

SMT. ZAMIRULNISHA ALIAS ZAMIRULNISHA MOHAMMAD LAIK SHAIKH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE CIVIL SECRT. LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/5676/2024 · 2025-07-21

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5676 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Zamirulnisha Alias Zamirulnisha Mohammad Laik Shaikh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Ashish Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. If, as claimed by the petitioner's counsel, the arbitrator has given the award in petitioner's favour under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, and the challenge to the said award by the N.H.A.I. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has come to an end on dismissal of the said proceedings, especially as the application for recall has also been dismissed, then, instead of filing this petition, the petitioner should have moved proceedings for enforcement/execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or if there is any other remedy under the statute of 1956 or any rule made thereunder, to pursue the same. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J) (Rajan Roy, J) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 A.Dewal Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench