- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16783 WP No. 1641 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 1641 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. L. NAYANISHA, S/O. DR. A. LOKESHA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. 2. SRI. L. KARTHIKESHA, S/O. DR. A. LOKESHA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT NO.77, 7TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, C.T. BED LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, HOSAKERAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 085. REPRESENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT. K.G. LATHA W/O. DR. A.LOKESHA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, "CHAMUNDI SADANA", NATIONAL HIGHWAY-206. NEAR KADUR ROAD., BANAVARA BYPASS, BANAVARA POST. ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 112. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHIDHAR S. KARAMADI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16783 WP No. 1641 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY. DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, M.S. BUILDING. 3RD FLOOR, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYAT - ARASIKERE, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 102. 3. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GRAMA PANCHAYAT BANAVARA, POST: BANAVARA, TALUK: ARASIKERE. HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 112. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.01.2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS, THROUGH THEIR GPA HOLDER VIDE ANNX-A AND ACCORDINGLY TO ALLOT A SITE NO. 34 JANJARU NO. 1561 MEASURING 20 X 50 SQUARE FEET, SITUATED AT BANAVARA VILLAGE, BANAVARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BANAVARA HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK, IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16783 WP No. 1641 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal which reads as hereunder: "The Respondent No.2 and 3 have already conceded to the request of the petitioner in the above petition. Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose of the petition as the same is rendered infructuous in the interest of justice." In light of the same, petition does not call for any adjudication and accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 40 CT: BHK