GHULAM MOHI-UD-DIN YATOO AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/1916/2023 · 2025-11-26
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14465 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14465 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 11 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1916/2023 CM(4477/2023) CM(7005/2023) GHULAM MOHI-UD-DIN YATOO AND ANR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS.
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER
26.11.2025.
Learned counsel for petitioners last appeared on 16.12.2023, i.e., about two years back. Thereafter, none has turned up. Petitioners are continuously absent today on fifth consecutive date of hearing. It is sufficient to indicate that they have lost interest in the prosecution of the present case. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CMs.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Srinagar:
26.11.2025. Misba