Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14464 (CHH)

AMIT SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/801/2019 · 2025-08-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43845 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 801 of 2019 1. Amit Singh Thakur S/o Late Kunwar Singh Thakur Aged About 42 Years R/o S.M.I.G. No. 20, Parijat Extension, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ranu Singh Thakur W/o Amit Singh Thakur Aged About 40 Years R/o S.M.I.G. No. 20, Parijat Extension, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Prakash Mishra S/o Vyas Narayan Mishra Aged About 33 Years R/o Near Shivram Atta Chakki, Seepat Road Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 29 .08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Malay Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No. 1/State BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.08.29 18:00:31 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the charge-sheet dated 31.12.2018 filed by the respondent No. 1 on 04.01.2019 against the petitioners for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 120-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in the interest of justice.” 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission from this Court to withdraw the present petition, as evidence has been recorded and the trial is in progress. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan