Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144629 (MAD)

S.Murugan v. M.Ponnammal

CRP(MD)/1783/2025 · 2025-07-01

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI C.R.P.(MD)No.1783 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD).No.9719 & 9120 of 2025 S.Murugan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Ponnammal 2.M.Jayanthi ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to strike off the proceedings in D.V.C.No.1 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murugappan * * * * * ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to quash the case in D.V.C.No.1 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. 2. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is dispensed with. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3. The petitioner herein is respondent in D.V.C.No.1 of 2025 before the trial Court. The respondents herein has filed D.V.C.No.1 of 2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District, under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the husband of first respondent and father of the second respondent. The respondents have initiated domestic violence proceedings against the petitioner. He would further submit that continuation of the said case would cause considerable hardship to the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the allegations made by the respondents in the DVC case. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be permitted to raise all the grounds mentioned herein before the trial court. He also requests this Court to dispense with his personal appearance before the trial court. 5.In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner shall raise all the grounds as raised herein before the trial court at the time of trial. Further, taking into consideration the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the appearance of the petitioner before the trial court is dispensed with except for his appearance for the purpose of receiving the copy of the proceedings u/s 230 of BNSS, framing of charges, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis questioning under Section 351 of BNSS and on the day on which judgment is to be pronounced. However, if for any particular reason, the presence of the petitioner is necessary, the trial court, at its wisdom, shall direct his appearance on those days. Further, this Court directs the petitioner to represent the case through the counsel. 6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 01.07.2025 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No ta To:- 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District 2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis M.DHANDAPANI, J. ta C.R.P.(MD)No.1783 of 2025 01.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis