Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14458 (CHH)

NIKAHAT PARVEEN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1229/2025 · 2025-04-07

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16151-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1229 of 2025 1 - Nikahat Parveen W/o Mo. Ajaj Aged About 38 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Dist.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 2 - Abdul Majeed S/o Noor Mohammad Aged About 69 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Dist.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 3 - Kamru Nisha W/o Abdul Majeed Aged About 62 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Dist.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 4 - Astarun Nisha W/o Firoj Ansari Aged About 42 Years R/o Naim Nagar Old Court, Durgapur, Dist- Wardhman (West Bengal) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent Of Police District Raipur 4 - Police Station Mahila Thana Through- Officer Incharge Raipur District- Raipur 5 - Ishrat Parveen W/o Mo. Faiyaj Aged About 28 Years R/o Through- Father Mujiburrahman Ward No 28, Gaji Nagar Birgaon, Raipur, Dist- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.04.11 12:10:49 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Badruddin Khan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 07.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr. Badruddin Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1 to 4 / State. 3. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “(A) It is, therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the F.I.R no 01/2022, Charge Sheet issued under section 498-A, 506, 406,34 of the IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Act and criminal proceeding 1818/22 pending before the JMFC Raipur Dist Raipur (C.G.) (B) That, the honble high court, being pleased, to quash cognizance order dated 4/3/22 passed by JMFC Raipur Dist Raipur(C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 4. On a pointed query being made to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to what is the status of proceedings and why he has not enclosed the copy of complete order-sheet of the trial Court, he could not give any satisfactory answer to the same. 3 5. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer submits that arrest warrant has also been issued against the petitioners and the same has also not been challenged. 6. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh annexing the complete order-sheet of the trial Court showing the status of the proceedings of the present case. 7. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with complete order-sheet of the case, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Home for Mentally Underdeveloped Children, Mana Camp, District- Raipur (C.G.). 8. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet