Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144568 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/4780/2025 · 2025-06-03

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34424 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4780 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Gupta And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Neeraj Pal Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Neeraj Pal, learned counsel on behalf of Opposite Party No.2, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Neeraj Pal, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 15.10.2016 passed in Complaint Case No.1828 of 2016, under Sections 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) F.T.C. 1st/Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which had taken place between the parties has been filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the trial court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned, in that scenario, will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. The office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Salim Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench