KANHIYA LAL MEGHWAL v. STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENTORS
CW/4334/2012 · 2025-04-07
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14456 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14456 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4334/2012 Kanhiya Lal Meghwal Son of Shri Suraj Bhan, aged about 40 years , R/o VPO Bharu, Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Sikar Raj.
2. Sub Treasurer, Fatehpur, Sikar Raj.
3. Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Thimoli, Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/04/2025
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“I) The respondents may be directed to make payment of Honorarium of the petitioner for the year 2010 and 2011 further the payment of winter holiday, the summer holiday and Deepawali Holiday for the year 2010 ad 2011 be also made to the petitioner. ii) Respondents may be directed to make payment of pay from 01.05.2011 to 16.05.2011 to the petitioner. iii) Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner.”
(2 of 2) [CW-4334/2012]
2. None present on behalf of the counsel for the parties.
3. Reply to the writ petition indicates that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court while deciding SBCWP No. 3932/2009 on 08.05.2009 with the following observation:-
“Even in case of appropriate order of continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/DPC selected persons are available, the petitioner(S) are not entitled for wages of the vacations, in other words, when the schools are closed.”
4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this Court finds no valid reason to take a different view.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed in the light of the similar observation made by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while deciding the SBCWP No. 3932/2016 on
08.05.2009.
6. All pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/235