Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14456 (AP)

A. VENKATESWARLU v. Easter Power Distribution Compan of A.P. Ltd.,

WP/7767/2018 · 2025-07-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178462018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7767/2018 Between: 1. A. VENKATESWARLU, OCC ASSISTANT ENGINEER, R/O. PRATHIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. EASTER POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPAN OF A P LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, P AND T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER / HRD, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, P AND T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) on the ground of pendency of Criminal Case in CC.No.48 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) along with other candidates in the seniority list without reference to the pendency of the criminal case forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: 2 “ ... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) on the ground of pendency of Criminal Case in CC.No.48 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) along with other candidates in the seniority list without reference to the pendency of the criminal case forthwith ....” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent-Corporation would submit that with the very same prayer, Petitioner has filed number of writ petitions and one of such WP No.24546 of 2024 was disposed of on 29.11.2024. However, the name of the Petitioner was mentioned in the present panel and his name stood at Serial No.7 and that no further orders are necessary. 4. A perusal of the material on record, CC No.48 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada to the Court of Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Rajahmundry and re-numbered as CC No.101 of 2018. 5. For the foregoing reasons, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7767 of 2018 08.07.2025 Mjl /*