Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144522 (MAD)

Chithiravelu v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

WP(MD)/16543/2025 · 2025-06-19

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD).No.16543 of 2025 Chithiravelu ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. Vinayagamoorthy 4. Manikandan 5. Veerapandi 6. Maarimuthu ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner in Appeal No. 751/2025 pending on his file. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.M.Gangatharan Government Advocate ORDER The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of his appeal dated 10.02.2025 pending in A.No.751 of 2025. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Gangatharan, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the property situated in S.No.18/1 with an extent of 1 acre 36 cents in Ottaangulam Village, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District is his ancestral property and the same has been in possession of the petitioner and other three persons. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 5. The private respondents submitted an application before the 2nd respondent seeking transfer of patta in their name and the said application was ordered in their favour. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted an appeal before the 1st respondent in A.No.751 of 2025 dated 10.02.2025. The said appeal has not been considered by the 1st respondent till date. Therefore, the petitioner has come before this Court. 6. The learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner will be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. 7. In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner in A.No.751 of 2025 dated 10.02.2025 and pass final orders on its own merits within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and private respondents 3 to 6. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 8. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. 19.06.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16543 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR , J. rgm W.P.(MD).No.16543 of 2025 19.06.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis