IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236 CRM-A-253-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Naib Singh ... Appellant(s) VERSUS Smt. Surinder Kaur ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Tanya Vashist, Advocate for the Appellant(s) (Legal Aid Counsel). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present application has been preferred seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 21.10.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Khanna, in a case stemming from complaint bearing CIS No.NACT/382/2019 filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. The complaint (supra) was filed on the ground of dishonour of cheque of Rs.30,00,000/-. After assessing all the material available on the record, the learned trial Court acquitted the respondent(s) vide judgment dated 21.10.2019. 3. It is noticed that the instant application pertains to the year 2020, however, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the applicant(s), hence, it is deemed expedient to nominate a Legal Aid Counsel. Ms. Tanya Vashist, Advocate (PH/4744/2023, Mob. No.81989-48782), who is present in the Court, is appointed as the Legal Aid Counsel to represent the case on MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.24 10:39 I am the author of this document 2 236 CRM-A-253-2020 (O&M) behalf of applicant(s) to arrive at a decision. She has gone through the case file and submits that the present application has been filed against the judgment of acquittal dated 21.10.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Khanna, in complaint bearing CIS No.NACT/382/2019 filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. She fairly submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, the applicant would have a remedy before the Court of Sessions. 4. In view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded to the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana with a direction to treat the same as an appeal filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and entrust the same to appropriate Court for its disposal on merits. 5. The Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and the record of the case to the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana forthwith. 6. Disposed of accordingly. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 8. A copy of this order be sent to the High Court Legal Service Committee for information and necessary action. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 22.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.24 10:39 I am the author of this document