RAVI GANJHU ALIAS RAVI BHOKTA ALIAS SHAMBHU GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4274/2025 · 2025-06-03
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14451 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14451 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14471 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4274 of 2025
--- Ravi Ganjhu @ Ravi Bhokta @ Shambhu Ganjhu, aged about 40 years, Son of-Nakul Ganjhu, Resident of Vill.-Humbi, P.O.- Saradhu and P.S.-Tandwa, Dist.-Latehar
......Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
--Opposite party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, A.P.P
--- 03/03.06.2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
2.
The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Garu P.S. Case No. 01/2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 637/2024, S.T. No. 52 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 147,148,149,353,307 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner’s name has come in the F.I.R. only on the basis of suspicion and he has neither apprehended from the place of occurrence nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. Learned counsel further submits that the similarly situated co-accused, Tepa Kumar @ Sanjay Singh @ Tepa Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh Kherwar has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.06.2024 in B.A. No. 5450 of 2024 and he is in custody since 19.09.2024.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the fact that similarly co-accused has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner
2025:JHHC:14471 2
on bail. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar, in connection with Garu P.S. Case No. 01/2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 637/2024, S.T. No. 52 of 2025.
It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
jk