SURYA PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/50329/2013 · 2025-09-24
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14447 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14447 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 50329 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 25, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anirudh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satish Mandhyan, V.B.Misra (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Surya Pratap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad