1 2025:CGHC:19557-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1123 of 2025 Dinesh Yadav S/o Rati Ram Yadav Aged About 36 Years Resident of Village Boirdadar, P.S. Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh Permanent Address- Dharamjaigarh, Jailpara, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Home, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Director General of Police Police Department, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent of Police Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Station House Officer Police Station Jutmil, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Jeevan Lal Sahu S/o Late Laxmi Prasad Sahu Aged About 28 Years Resident of Village Saraibhaddar, Police Station Jutmil, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrasen Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 30 .04.202 5 1. Heard Mr. Chandrasen Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 4. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. The present petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner seeking following prayers :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and to set-aside/ quash the First Information Report registered at police station Jutmil, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh in Crime No. 286/2024 under section 420, 120-B, 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022 against the accused persons as well as criminal proceeding of criminal Case No.1360/2024 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Class Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh against the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition on the ground that the petition as become infructuous as the petitioner has already been acquitted of the charges. 4. In view of the same, the instant petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra