1 APHC010179462018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7821/2018 Between: 1. B.B.H.JR. COLLEGE (HIGH SCHOOL), VETAPALEM PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT BANDLA SARATH BABU AGE 66 YEARS ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAMDISTRICT., A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent, Commissioner of school Education, Andhra Pradesh in not communicating the lifting of the Ban by Government vide Memo in No. 18836/SE.PS/A1/2012 Dated 04-01-2017 and enabling the filling up of the vacant posts in Aided institutions and on the other 2 issuing executive instructions contrary to the Statutory Rules and confining the permission to fill up the posts to the Schools that are parties to Writ Petition No.9503/2005 and batch as being arbitrary, illegal, subversive of Rule of Law and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th Respondent to forthwith process the proposals of the Management dated 11-12-2017 for filling up of 14 Teaching and 4 Teaching vacant Aided posts as per the procedure contemplated in Go Ms. No 1 dated 01.01.1994 and issue such other Writ or Order or direction as deemed fit proper in the circumstances of case. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents to forthwith process the proposals of the Petitioner management dated 11-12-2017 for filling up of 14 Teaching and 4 Non-Teaching vacant Aided posts in Petitioner School and accord permission in terms of the provisions under GO Ms. No. 1, Dated: 1.1.1994, pending Writ Petition the interest of Justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in IA.No. 1/2018 in WP.No. 7821/2019 on dated 09.03.2018 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7821/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent, Commissioner of school Education, Andhra Pradesh in not communicating the lifting of the Ban by Government vide Memo in No. 18836/SE.PS/A1/2012 Dated 04-01- 2017 and enabling the filling up of the vacant posts in Aided institutions and on the other issuing executive instructions contrary to the Statutory Rules and confining the permission to fill up the posts to the Schools that are parties to Writ Petition No.9503/2005 and batch as being arbitrary, illegal, subversive of Rule of Law and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th Respondent to forthwith process the proposals of the Management dated 11-12-2017 for filling up of 14 Teaching and 4 Teaching vacant Aided posts as per the procedure contemplated in Go Ms. No 1 dated 01.01.1994 and issue such other Writ or Order or direction as deemed fit proper in the circumstances of case…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The Proceeding Sheet dated 03.12.2024 & 09.07.2025, also shows that none represented for the Petitioner. The Matter is directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Despite the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” in the list today, none represented the matter. It appears they have no interest in prosecuting the matter. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7821 of 2018 Dated.10.07.2025 UPS 68