TEMPU HAZAM ALIAS KALESHWAR HAZAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4275/2025 · 2025-05-15
Arun Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14444 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14444 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:14198 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4275 of 2025 Tempu Hazam @ Kaleshwar Hazam aged about 29 years, S/o Dashrath Hazam R/o Village-Bakaspur, P.O. & P.S.-Karra, District-Khunti (Jharkhand).
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
----------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI -------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
---------
Order No.02/ Dated 15th May, 2025
1. Heard the parties.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kamdara P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and under Section 17 of C.L.A. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla.
3. From perusal of record, it transpires that there is allegation against this petitioner that two co-accused persons Durga Singh and Ram Kumar Singh got apprehended along with petitioner and from possession of Durga Singh one country made loaded pistol, whereas from possession of co-accused Ram Kumar Singh two cartridges and from this petitioner leaflet of PLFI got recovered. Petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody since 13.03.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that the petitioner is having two cases to his credit and petitioner is no more required for further investigation and charge sheet has already been submitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of bail on the premise that petitioner is having criminal antecedent and he is a member of PLFI.
6. Considering the fact that alleged recovery has already been effected and charge sheet has been submitted and petitioner is no more required for further investigation, the petitioner named above, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla in connection with Kamdara P.S. Case No. 14 of
2025.
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Abhiraj/