M/S SHONKH TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
WP/3815/2020 · 2025-02-10
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14443 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14443 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5786 WP No. 3815 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3815 OF 2020 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S.SHONKH TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED DIRECTOR, SHRI DILIP KUMAR JHA, REGISTERED OFFICE:OFFICE NO.10, IIND FLOOR, APOLLO HOUSE, 82/84, BOMBAY SAMACHAR MARG, FORT, MUMBAI-400 023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUSHAL TIWARI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
1.
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE, THROUGH ITS RECOVERY HEAD RR CLUSTERS, ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE, 92/95, HJS CHAMBERS, 26, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025.
ALSO AT:
GENERAL MANAGER RECOVERY, ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE, H O.PLOT NO.5, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SECTOR-32.
GURUGRAM-122 001. (HARYANA).
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5786 WP No. 3815 of 2020
2.
RECOVERY OFFICER -1, THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-2, R/AT JEEVAN MANGAL BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, NO.4, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Sushal Tiwari., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.B.Prasanna Kumar., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person.
2. The Demand Notice dated:07.12.2019 issued by the Recovery Officer of DRT-2, Bengaluru in R.C.No.1267/2018 vide Annexure-L is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition.
3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5786 WP No. 3815 of 2020
4. Suffice it to note that the recovery case is pending adjudication before the DRT and the petitioner is a party to the proceedings. If at all, the petitioner has any grievance he can agitate the same before the Tribunal. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be rejected.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is rejected.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2