[2025:RJ-JP:22943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4762/2025 Anil Sharma @ Anil Pandit S/o Sh. Vimal Kumar Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Bevar, P.s. Hameerwas, District Churu. At Present Residing Behind Hanuman Mandir, Railway Colony, Subhash Nagar, Ward No. 15, P.s. Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.) (At Present In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 06/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.0223/2024 registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Section(s) 308(2), 308(5) and 351 (3), 61(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that co-accused namely; Naveen Kumar Doga @ Kalu @ Sahil and Sanwarmal have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11442/2024 vide order dated 20.12.2024. Petitioner is in custody since long, charge-sheet has been filed and offences are [2025:RJ-JP:22943] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4762/2025] triable by Magistrate and conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application and submitted that four other cases have also been registered against the petitioner, hence petitioner may not be released on bail. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by counsel for both the parties, and the fact that co-accused namely; Naveen Kumar Doga @ Kalu @ Sahil and Sanwarmal have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench, charge-sheet has been filed and the offences are triable by Magistrate, petitioner is in custody since long, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Anil Sharma @ Anil Pandit S/o Sh. Vimal Kumar Sharma is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till [2025:RJ-JP:22943] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4762/2025] trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J TN/47