Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14441 (PNJ)

BALWINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/2903/2025 · 2025-03-19

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-2903-2025 -1 255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2903-2025 Date of decision: 19.03.2025 BALWINDER SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, Asst. AG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Petition for Anticipatory Bail under Section 483 BNSS FIR No. Dated Police Staon Secons 178 29.04.2023 Division No.7, District Ludhiana 21, 61 of NDPS Act, 1985 (Secon 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 added later on) 1. The peoner apprehending the arrest in the FIR caponed above, has come up before this Court by filing the present peon under Secon 483 BNSS. 2. Status report by way of affidavit on behalf of the State has been handed over in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the peoner. 3. At the very outset, counsel for the peoner seeks permission to withdraw the present peon with liberty to file a fresh with be;er parculars. 4. Given above, peon is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that power of a;orney filed in the present case shall suffice and there shall be no need to file fresh power of a;orney in the fresh peon, if filed and Registry shall not raise any objecon. Pending applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. 19.03.2025 ( ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.03.21 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document