Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14439 (HP)

ARYAN CHANDEL @ ARU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CRMMO/661/2024 · 2025-06-18

Virender Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Deepak Ranote & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors. a/w connected matter Cr.MMO No.664 of 2024 a/w Cr.MMO No.661 of 2024 Cr. MMO No.664 of 2024 18.06.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tejasvi Sharma and Mr. H.S. Rawat Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2/State. Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 11. Cr.MMO No.661 of 2024 Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tejasvi Sharma and Mr. H.S. Rawat Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2/State. Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6. Cr.MP.No.2440/2025 in Cr.MMO No.664/2024 By way of the present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to delete the name of respondent No.10-Mahinder Singh, from the array of parties. As per the averments made in the application respondent No.10- Mahinder Singh is neither complainant nor injured and presently he is residing out of the country. The respondent No.10 is also stated to be not a necessary or proper party. In view of no objection, made by learned learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as, learned Additional Advocate General, representing for respondents No.1 and 2, the application under consideration is allowed and the name of respondent No.10-Mahinder Singh, is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties. Application stands disposed of. Cr.MMO No.664 of 2024 Amended memo of parties be taken on record. Vide separate order of even date, the petition is allowed. Cr.MP. No.2439/2025 in Cr. MMO No.661/2024 By way of the present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to delete the name of petitioner No.8-Mahinder Singh, from the array of parties. As per the averments made in the application petitioner No.8-Mahinder Singh is not interested to pursue the matter. The petitioner No.8, is also stated to be not a necessary or proper party. In view of no objection, made by learned Additional Advocate General, representing for respondents No.1 and 2, as well as, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3 to 6, the application under consideration is allowed and the name of petitioner No.8-Mahinder Singh, is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties. Application stands disposed of. Cr.MMO No.661 of 2024 Amended memo of parties be taken on record. Vide separate order of even date, the petition is allowed. (Virender Singh) Judge June 18, 2025 (subhash)