VINOD KUMAR YADAV @ VINOD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/5034/2025 · 2025-06-05
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144381 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144381 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34676 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5034 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar,Amar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in three cases mentioned in the gang chart. In all three cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been released on bail. Specific pleading in this regard has been made in paragraph 5 of the writ petition. Apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart, there is no other case pending against the accused applicant. It has been further submitted that co-accused Santosh Kumar @ Babloo has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 21.09.2023 passed in CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11339 of 2023 It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 14.09.2020 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co- operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.
On due consideration to the fact that in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been enlarged on bail; apart from those three cases, there is no other case pending against the applicant; co-accused Santosh Kumar @ Babloo has been enlarged on bail as well as considering the long period of incarceration and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant, Vinod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Yadav, involved in Case Crime No. 226/2020, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Vikas Nagar, District - Lucknow, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. (vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may
proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (vii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
Order Date :- 5.6.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench