HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 50387 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 25, 2025 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devi Prasad Mishra, Vrindavan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anay Kumar Srivastava, Shivam Yadav (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Brij Mohan Tanwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad