MOHAMMAD REHAN ANSARI and ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
A482/3137/2021 · 2025-01-30
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144358 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144358 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6365 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3137 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohammad Rehan Ansari And Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Nath Pandey,Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bharat Kumar Dixit Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Shri Satyendra Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"The Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to pass an order or direction quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.509/2019 U/S-323/498A/504 /506 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act., P.S.- Jais, District Raibareily, dated 20.07.2019 (Laraib Fatima Versus Rehan Ansari & others) including the entire proceedings pending before the learned court of Fast Track Court (Senior Divisioin). Raibareily as it relates to the applicants."
Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that this matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court. However, the report of the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court dated 31.08.2022 shows that the mediation has failed. Taking note of the fact that mediation has been failed, as also the allegation against the applicants, who are husband and other family members of the opposite party No.2, who is the wife of applicant No.1, on being confronted, learned counsel for the applicants states that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to take the benefit of the law as laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for and
with a direction to the court below that if the applicant(s)applies/apply for bail before the Court concerned, his/their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in the light of the law as laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine.
Order Date :- 30.1.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench