IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.495 of 2025 Decided on: 27th May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Bir Sahib ....Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner alleges non-implementation of judgment rendered in Bir Sahib Vs. HRTC & anr2 . 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record two office orders, both dated 26.05.2025, and on that basis submits that petitioner’s services have been regularized after completion of one year of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 3838 of 2025, decided on 19.03.2025 - 2 - contractual service; His pay has also been re-fixed. That all endeavour shall be made by the respondents to take consequential actions on the basis of above office orders within a period of six months from today. Taking note of the above, present Execution Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances , if any, in accordance with law, at an appropriate stage, Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 27, 2025 R.Atal