[2025:RJ-JP:18646] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2000/2025 1. Jaswant Singh S/o Ram Chandra Saini, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Jain College Ke Paas, Tijara, Rajasthan- 301411. 2. Ratan S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Khuntala, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411. 3. Sonu S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Khuntala, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411. 4. Pushkar Saini S/o Makhanlal Saini, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Hanuman Baghichi Ke Paas, Ward No. 8, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411. 5. Kamlesh S/o Raghuveer, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Jain College Ke Paas, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411. 6. Gordhan Saini S/o Raghuvir Saini, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Jain College Ke Paas, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Anil Kumar Mathur S/o Shyamsharan Mathur, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Tijara, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan- 301411. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Bhadadra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Anurag Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/05/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the FIR No.571/2024, registered at Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwadi for offences under Sections 191(2), [2025:RJ-JP:18646] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2000/2025] 246, 229(1), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 61(2)(A) of BNS, on the basis of compromise entered between the parties vide Annexure-2. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 concedes that the petitioners and respondent No.2 have entered into compromise which bears the signature of respondent No.2-Anil Kumar Mathur vide Annexure-2. It is also contended that on 08.04.2025, this Court verified the contents of the compromise entered between the parties and the complainant admitted the fact of entering into compromise with the petitioners. The dispute between the parties pertains to land for which civil suit is also pending, the parties have agreed upon to withdraw the civil suit and also not to prosecute the present petitioners, therefore, considering the above facts the complainant will have no objection upon quashing of the said FIR. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the fact that the parties have agreed upon the compromise and the said compromise bears the signature of the complainant, the dispute between the parties is inter-se and does not affect the society at large, this Court placing reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2022 (14) SCC 531, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present petition. 5. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed on the ground of compromise entered between the parties and the FIR No.571/2024, registered [2025:RJ-JP:18646] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2000/2025] at Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwadi with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR)J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-207