- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15700 WP NO.2923 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.2923 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. G.K. SURESH S/O LATE KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.149, 2ND CROSS, GUNDAPPA LAYOUT, CHINTHAMANI TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBASH REDDY V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPUR, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 102. 3. THE THASILDAR CHINTHAMANI TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TOWN - 563 125. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15700 WP NO.2923 OF 2025 5. SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA S/O RAMAIAH, AGE: MAJOR, NARAYANAHALLI VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHITAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVA REDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.07.2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.RRT(THI)CHIN/72/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-F; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO RESTORE THE ENTRIES IN THE REVENUE RECORDS AS THEY EXISTED AS ON 28.06.1999 IN MR NO.82-58/1999-2000 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S LAND IN SURVEY NO.43 OF NARAYANAHALLI VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 3 ACRE 06 GUNTAS VIDE ANNEXURE-C; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner herein aggrieved by the order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act has filed this petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15700 WP NO.2923 OF 2025 2. Since the impugned order is passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, there is a statutory remedy available to the petitioner to file a revision under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. 3. In that view of the matter, I decline to entertain this petition and reserve liberty to the petitioner to approach Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act by way of Revision. 4. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41