Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14432 (UTT)

KHASHTI ARARA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2138/2025 · 2025-12-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:10903 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS 2137/2025 WPSS 2138/2025 WPSS 2141/2025 WPSS 2145/2025 WPSS 2148/2025 WPSS 2151/2025 WPSS 2152/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Dhanik, Mr. Mahendra Singh Rawat (proxy counsel for Mr. Prabhat Bohra) and Dr. Govind Singh Latwal, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy AG, for the State. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, for the selecting body. (2) Petitioners have become overage for appointment as Health Worker (Female), as per Condition No. 9 mentioned in the advertisement dated 14.11.2025. By means of these writ petitions, petitioners have challenged Condition No. 9 of the said advertisement. (3) Learned Counsel for the parties are unanimous on the point that similar issue was dealt with by this Court in WPSS No. 1991 of 2025. (4) Accordingly, writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 21.11.2025, rendered in WPSS No. 1991 of 2025. It is made clear that the selection process shall continue, unhindered by representation, if any, made by the petitioners. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 9.12.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.12.10 10:11:51 +05'30' 2025:UHC:10903