Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144299 (ALL)

LAXMI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

A483/481/2025 · 2025-06-05

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34632 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 481 of 2025 Applicant :- Laxmi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Meva Lal Yadav,Saddam Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard Ms. Harshita Gupta Advocate holding brief of Sri Meva Lal Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the prayer to direction to the trial court, Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ambedkar Nagar to expedite the hearing and disposal of the criminal case no.57 of 2022 (State vs Ajay Pal and Ors) U/s 498-A, 304-B IPC & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act P.S. Akbarpur District Ambedkar Nagar, in pursuance of summoning order dated 01.10.2024. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit. 4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the trial court, Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ambedkar Nagar to consider and decide the proceedings of criminal case no.57 of 2022 (State vs Ajay Pal and Ors) U/s 498-A, 304-B IPC & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act P.S. Akbarpur District Ambedkar Nagar most expeditiously, provided there is no legal impediment affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench