Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144296 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDUCATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/6632/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34161 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6632 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Neelesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nitin Mathur, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3. 2. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the petitioner the arrears of minimum of regular pay scale of Rs.18000/- per month as per the recommendation of VIIth Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2016 and also the arrears of minimum of regular pay scale as per VIth Pay Commission report till the date of his superannuation. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexure No.11 to the writ petition, in accordance with law." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy in the instant writ petition has already been settled up to Apex Court, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner may be redressed. He has further prayed that the appropriate decision maybe taken by the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya. Therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. 4. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. 5. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya taking all his pleas, grounds, aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 6. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. Writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench