[2025:RJ-JP:25816] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5825/2024 Manju Devi W/o Shri Rajbahadur, aged about 37 Years, R/o Devli, Village and Post Devli, Gram Panchayat Devli Village, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer 3. Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Tonk. 4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Devli, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Narendra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr.Ashutosh Udawat & Mr.Sumit Purohit JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned charge-sheet dated 01.06.2023 issued to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Devli Village, District Tonk in the year 2015. A charge-sheet has been served upon her with the allegation that certain pattas were prepared with fix signatures in the name of her husband in the year 2014. [2025:RJ-JP:25816] (2 of 3) [CW-5825/2024] Counsel submits that the petitioner was Sarpanch at the relevant time. 3. Counsel submits that a charge-sheet, with similar allegations, was served upon the husband of the petitioner, while he was holding the post of Sarpanch prior to 2010. Counsel further submits that with regard to similar allegations, a complaint was lodged with the Anti-Corruption Bureau, wherein a preliminary enquiry was conducted, but no F.I.R. was registered against the petitioner, hence, the charge-sheet is liable to be quashed and set-aside and under these circumstances, allegations levelled against the petitioner has no bearing, hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as after serving charge- sheet upon the petitioner, an enquiry has been conducted and final orders have been passed by the Divisional Commissioner vide order dated 25.07.2024 by which the petitioner has been declared as disqualified for election to the Panchayati Raj Institution for five years. Counsel submits that under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this writ petition and this writ petition is liable to be rejected on this count alone. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the respondents and looking to the fact that after issuance of the charge-sheet, an enquiry was conducted against the petitioner and final orders have been passed against her on [2025:RJ-JP:25816] (3 of 3) [CW-5825/2024] 25.07.2024, now, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this writ petition and under the changed circumstances, this writ petition has become infructuous. 7. The instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to assail the subsequent order dated 25.07.2024, before the appropriate forum of law and take all these arguments, which have been taken before this Court, before appropriate forum of law. 8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /22