Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144246 (ALL)

KULDEEP KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/4747/2025 · 2025-06-03

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34348 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4747 of 2025 Applicant :- Kuldeep Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaskaran Lal Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicants, after arguing at some length, submits that the applicants want to withdraw this application with liberty to appear before the trial court and apply for bail. He further submits that if the applicants file their bail application before the trial court that may be considered and decided expeditiously, keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicants to appear before the trial court and file an application for bail. It is further provided that if such bail application is filed, that may be considered and decided by the trial court, keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 3. So far as the request made by the learned counsel for the applicants that they may be given liberty to file an application seeking discharge from the offences, as contemplated under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C. is concerned, it is always open for the applicants to file such application after they are enlarged on bail. Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench