DHARMENDRA @ VIPIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/7021/2024 · 2025-09-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7021 of 2024 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Arjun Singh Kalhans, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.74 of 2022, under Section 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Karaundikalan, District Sultanpur. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in 12 cases, although merely three cases have been made the basis of imposition of Gangsters Act upon him. 4. The applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. 5. Co-accused persons, namely, Jitendra Singh, Bhupendra Singh @ Puttul, Amit Singh, Shivmurti Singh, Vipin Singh and Jitendra Pratap Singh have been granted bail in the present case. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arjun Singh Kalhans Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dharmendra @ Vipin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, co-accused persons have been granted bail in the present case and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.04.2021 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10.
Let the applicant-Dharmendra @ Vipin be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 15, 2025 Anurag BAIL No. 7021 of 2024 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench