[2025:RJ-JP:21611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 894/2025 Dimple Urf Dimpa Son Of Shri Jairam, Aged About 30 Years, Raisdpur Police Station Mandawar District Dausa (Raj) (Presently Accused Confined In District Jail Dausa) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Rinku S/o Mohanlal, R/o Samlati Mahua District Dausa (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/05/2025 1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Dausa (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No. 0107/2024 registered at Police Station Mahwa, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections 143, 364-A, 384 and 307 of IPC, whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no iota of evidence by which it can be said that the so called injury caused [2025:RJ-JP:21611] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-894/2025] to the injured are dangerous to life. He again submits that co-accused- Girdhari, Lakhansingh and Rinku have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The appellant is behind the Bar since 11.03.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the appeal of the appellant may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made on behalf of the appellant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and argument advanced by learned counsel for the appellant but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act. 6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellant- Dimple Urf Dimpa Son Of Shri Jairam shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/268