Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14422 (UTT)

MOHD ALIM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3661/2025 · 2025-12-31

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 60 WPMS No. 3661 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the respondent no.3. The challenge in this petition is made to the recovery certificate dated 22.10.2020 with regard to the electricity charges. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that the appeal is provided under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal. He also submits that for a week, the respondent no.3 may not make any recovery. To it, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that for a week, the proceedings of recovery shall not be initiated. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 31.12.2025 Jitendra