LAL MANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/5566/2025 · 2025-06-04
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34532 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5566 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lal Mani Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhat Kumar,Prince Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 4 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.5 to 11 is dispensed with. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a suit under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 ('the Code', for short) was filed which came to be decided in favour of the present petitioner. The appeal preferred by the private-respondents was dismissed whereafter they approached the Board of Revenue, however, before the Board, the petitioner has appeared, but there is no interim order nor the appeal has been admitted as yet.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved an application for implementation of the impugned order passed in proceedings under Section 116 of the Code. Having considered the aforesaid and noticing that the application/representation, which has been brought on record as Annexure No.5, it appears that the application/representation has been moved by the petitioner only on 22.05.2025. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition at this stage, however, leaving it open for the petitioner to move an appropriate authority for getting an order for implementation. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the aforesaid liberty is granted to the petitioner for approaching the appropriate authority, who shall take a decision on the pending application/representation of the petitioner. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Rakesh/- Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench