Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33620 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3744 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Chandar @ Ram Chandra Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pal Singh Yadav,Prathama Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to implead the necessary party in the petition as respondent. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned counsels for side- opposite. Taking note of the aforesaid, this Court is of the view that the prayer sought is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead necessary party as respondent no. 6 during the course of the day. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "i. To pass an appropriate order or direction, directing the learned Commissioner Lucknow Division Lucknow to decide the Revision No. C202510000001007 filed by the petitioner under section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (now section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006), contained in Annexure No.6 to this petition within stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court and firstly decide the interim application forthwith. ii. To pass an appropriate order or direction, direct the opposite party no. 5 not to made any construction over the land in question and maintain status quo till disposal of the interim application filed by the petitioner in Revision No. C202510000001007, pending before opposite party no.2 and also direct to concerned police to ensure to stop the construction work illegally made by the opposite party no.5." Taking note of the fact of the case as also that during the pendency of the revision rights of parties should be preserved as held by the Apex Court in the case of Moolchand Yadav & Another v. Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd., Rampur and others, reported in (1982) 3 SCC 484 as also that the authority who can pass the final order can also pass interim order as held by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Vinod Kumar Bhalotia vs. State of U.P., reported in 2000 (18) LCD 532, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commission, Lucknow Division, Lucknow to decide the interim relief application in the pending Revision No. C202510000001007 if possible on the next date fixed in the case and if for any reason it is not possible on the next date, then it shall be decided within one month, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Before parting it would be apt to observed that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 read with Para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, a revision or appeal should be decided preferably within a period of six months. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench