Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38037 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5412 of 2025 Applicant :- Indrajeet Alias Nankhe Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijai Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Vijai Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Manish Vikram Singh Chauhan, the learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Ram Kripal Yadav, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3. 2. The instant application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the summoning order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Addl. District Judge/Spl. Judge PC Act-I, Lucknow in S.T. No.1027 of 2019 arsing out of the Case Crime No.217 of 2017 under Sections 498-A, 323, 313 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, police station- Nigohan, Lucknow including the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that they have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and they have arrived at the compromise. Compromise entered into between the parties have been placed on record as Annexure-4 to the petition. The parties have confirmed the terms of the compromise and the parties have agreed to part their ways by way of mutual consent. Compromise has been verified between the parties by Addl. District Judge/Spl. Judge PC Act-I, Lucknow vide order dated 17.01.2025 in compliance of the order dated 20.12.2024 passed by this Court in Application u/s 482 No.11778 of 2024. 4. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus Station of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466, it would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to quash the criminal proceedings as continuance of the proceedings in pursuance of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 6. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise arrived at between the parties and law laid down by the Supreme Court of India, the present petition is allowed and the summoning order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Addl. District Judge/Spl. Judge PC Act-I, Lucknow in S.T. No.1027 of 2019 arsing out of the Case Crime No.217 of 2017 under Sections 498-A, 323, 313 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, police station- Nigohan, Lucknow including the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 4.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench