Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14418 (RAJ)

SHIV PRASAD SON OF SHRI RAMNIWASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WMAP/81/2025 · 2025-05-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 81/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19253/2024 Shiv Prasad Son Of Shri Ramniwash, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Rasidpura, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. The Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan Shiksha Sankul, JLN Magar, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/05/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant has apprised the Court with the fact that the present application is moved with a plea to note and mark the attendance of the counsel representing the applicant/petitioner, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19253/2024. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner prayed that the said petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a fresh petition on account of subsequent developments. For the reasons detailed out in the memo of the application for recalling/modification and upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant; it is considered just and proper in the interest of justice [2025:RJ-JP:19317] (2 of 2) [WMAP-81/2025] to modify the order dated 06.03.2025, to the extent of demarking the presence of the counsel for the petitioner i.e. Shri Ved Prakash Sogarwal and accordingly, the said petition is disposed of with the liberty as prayed for being granted and take appropriate recourse on account of subsequent developments in accordance with the law. It is made clear that the present order may be treated as the part and parcel of the order dated 06.03.2025, and no other material changes are made apart from the aforementioned. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-239