APHC010178952019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7709/2019 Between: 1. NAMALA SANTHAKUMARI,, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.60-23-2, S.B.I COLONY, NO.1, HOUSE NO.4, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. MALLELA LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O. M.NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC- MONEY LENDER, R/O.DOOR NO.66-1-20, SIVALAYAM STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MALLELA RAMKUMAR, S/O.LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC- MONEY LENDER, R/O.DOOR NO.66-1-20, SIVALAYAM STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MALLELA SAI PRIYA, W/O.MALLELA RAM KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC- MONEY LENDER, R/O.DOOR NO.66-1-20, SIVALAYAM STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 7. MALLELA HARICHANDRA SIVA PRASAD, S/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- DOCUMENT WRITER, R/O.DOOR NO.66-1-20, SIVALAYAM STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action on the part of the respondent No.3 in pressurizing the petitioner to settle the issue in connection with the complaint, dated 15-03-2019 with the respondents No.4 to 7, instead of registering the crime against the respondents No.4 to 7 as arbitrary, illegal and violate of the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to handover the investigation in connection with complaint, dated 15-03-2019 to any other superior Police officer other than the respondent No.3 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 not to pressurize me to get settle the issue with the respondents NO.4 to 7 in connection with the complaint, dated 15-03¬2019 submitted by me, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7709 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri N.Ramesh, learned counsel representing Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7709 of 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 PSA