TRISHA SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/6967/2024 · 2025-08-12
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144161 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144161 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47133 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6967 of 2024 Applicant :- Trisha Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Singh,Dev Mani Mishra,Diwakar Prasad Sharma,Himadri Goswami,Kapil Kumar Yadav,Pawan Kumar Yadav,Piyush Pathak,Rajendra Pratap Singh,Vinay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt,Vimlesh Kumar Kashyap Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Shri Piyush Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0197 of 2024, under Sections 307 I.P.C., registered at Police Station P.G.I., District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been lodged on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 02.04.2024, against two persons described by the name "Sandeep Ki Patni Ruchi" and "Sandeep Ki Saas" and an unknown women, stating that the informant is bhabhi of Sandeep, the accused persons offered her Panchamrit as prasad and after consuming the same, the informant vomited. The informant restrained her son from consuming the panchamrit. The informant was examined medically in Civil Hospital, Lucknow where she was told that she had consumed some substance like mercury but was out of danger. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, she has been falsely implicated in the present case and she has no criminal history. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that both the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail in the present case. 6. The State has filed the counter affidavit annexing therewith copies of materials collected during the investigation and a copy of the charge sheet dated 21.06.2024. The complainant has also filed a counter affidavit. No medical papers have been annexed with the counter affidavits filed by the State or by the complainant. 7.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that both the co-accused persons have already been granted bail, the applicant is a women, she has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 06.04.2024 whereas the investigations already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Trisha Shukla be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench