SAVITA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/484/2025 · 2025-06-05
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144160 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144160 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34654 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 484 of 2025 Applicant :- Savita Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Rashmi Pandey,Swadha Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents.
2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the following main prayer:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ayodhya/Faizabad to decide the Case No.359 of 2017 (Under Section 125 Cr.P.C) "Savita Pandey Versus Satish Kumar Pandey" pending before him, expeditiously as early as possible within a stipulated period as to be framed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit.
4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ayodhya/Faizabad to decide the Case No.359 of 2017 (Under Section 125 Cr.P.C) "Savita Pandey Versus Satish Kumar Pandey" most expeditiously, provided there is no legal impediment affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible.
6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall
consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench